Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
entr0py
Member Profile
Member Since: 2007-06-28
Last Power Points used: never • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now

Comments
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 1 week 1 day ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 2 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Really? You honestly haven't heard that? I've heard it many times, especially when I lived in California. Sometimes, if Atheists or Agnostics are bothered by the outcome of some morally significant legislation, they pull the "separation" doctrine out like it has some type of relevance. I'm too lazy to find a source, but I promise that I'm not making this stuff up.

In reply to this comment by entr0py:
>> ^thepinky:
I am very much in support of people who are gay, but I am slightly sick of hearing that when people make voting decisions based on their beliefs, they are somehow violating the "separation of church and state" doctrine.


Really, you've heard people make that argument more then once? Enough times to make you sick of it? If you can find some example that would be awesome, because it seems like a straw man to me.



written by thepinky  | 3 weeks 5 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Had to dupe your video. http://www.videosift.com/video/Glenn-Beck-Asks-Innappropriate-Question. It had ridiculously bad tags, so I'm not surprised you didn't find it.


written by demon_ix  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
*yawn

In reply to this comment by entr0py:
That was a somewhat interesting medical curiosity ruined by unbelievably irritating presentation. Just sayin'


written by inflatablevagina  | 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
hey, you know you can vote for your own sifts... go on, it´s okay...

http://www.videosift.com/video/Gmod-Arena-Billy-Mays-VS-Vance


written by NeuralNoise  | 8 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
In reply to this comment by entr0py:
Actually the judges are right. It's a little known fact that singularities were originally termed "bad holes". It was Stephen Hawking that popularized the euphemism "black hole". Stephen Hawking, as we all know, is the world's most notorious white supremacist cyborg cosmologist.

This is one of the greatest comment I've ever read.


written by poolcleaner  | 1 year 4 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
that was a *quality link. please post it in the sifttalk section (under politics)

In reply to this comment by entr0py:
The thing that upsets me most is that the majority of the congress is complicit in allowing this to pass. We have to expect this sort of thing from Bush, but why are the Democrats helping him? The law "being rushed through" isn't an excuse for it so easily passing in a democratic congress. I see it as a failure by those who voted for it and didn't understand it, and a betrayal by those those who voted for knowing it's contents.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=s110-1927



written by qruel  | 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
That "Very Hungry Kitten" video that you submitted is the funniest thing ever! I think I've been watching it at least twice a day since. Hahaha!


written by Issykitty  | 2 years 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook
          - OR -
log in or register to submit new comment


1
Member Stats
Rank: 597
Rating: 7 star points
Votes Received: 271
Average Votes Per Video: 45.17
Votes Cast: 398
Comments Posted: 366 • browse
Comments Applauded: 9
Sifted Videos: 6
Dead Pool Fixes: 1
Profile Views: 3738